Can a man who has committed crimes of treason become a President of the United States?
According to some, there is a person who holds the highest office in the land who has committed treasonous acts. To clarify though, committing treason and being convicted of treason are two different events. Until a man is convicted of treason, they can hold any public office as long as the people elect them and they are not charged.
In this piece by State of the Nation they discuss the quid pro quo that our new president used with Ukraine to have a prosecutor removed while looking into irregularities with a company his son was associated with.
But, to date, the Attorney General has not charged any crimes associated with the self incriminating video that was released. Just watch the video.
And in this version of Swamp Watch, Fox News lays out the Biden Ukraine Timeline. All of this information was available before the 2020 election and still we are led to believe over 80M Americans voted for the person who openly admits to quid pro quo.
Joe Biden, acting in his official capacity of Vice President of the United States of America, bribed the Ukraine government in order to compel President Petro Poroshenko to fire the General Prosecutor. This criminal act was carried out with the explicit intent to terminate the ongoing criminal investigation of Burisma Holdings Limited, as well as to stop the investigation and avert the prosecution of his son—Board Director Hunter Biden.
And this is shared by many news sources. Peter Schweizer explained how Joe Biden’s family members monetized political influence in a video interview with Breitbart News.
The main question is really whether what is portrayed here really represents treasonous offenses. What is treason?
As this recent Saturday Evening Post article states “The Constitution, in Article III, is quite clear on what treason involves. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. “
In this Saturday Evening Post article it also states “The overt act of treason must show criminal intent and support the accomplishment of a crime. The Constitution requires both concrete action and intent to betray the nation for a conviction of treason.”
I don’t think the actions with Ukraine constitute the grounds for treason. As an example, if China or Iran had conspired with someone in the US to modify votes in an election in order to prop up their own individual or party to put in place in America, then you would have something closer to treason being warranted. But the article goes even further by saying:
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
Well, taking our analogy even a step further, we now see that anyone who had knowledge of the treasonous act or was involved with the act, they too may be prosecuted. This would mean that anyone in Congress who openly conspired with the enemy in modifying votes in the US elections while working with enemies of the US can now be put in prison for 7 years.
Has any of this been reviewed by a court of law? Has any charges been made? I think we are in for a bumpy ride in America. Buckle up and put your seat belt on America..
I joined over 250,000+ people in DC in a march to save America. Why did I drive from Las Cruces NM to Washington DC? Because I belief America is at a crossroad in history. Some want to enter into Socialism and Communism while some want to continue as a free republic. There is also the untold story about the rally which no one is hearing. Let me tell you about the untold story.
I left Las Cruces and made a stop with a friend in Wichita. My friend is a Catholic Priest. When I asked if I could spend the night as I was travelling to DC, he said he was leaving in a few days to do the same. I said, ‘Wait, what?’ Yes, he was heading to the same event and was going to ride with 2 of his brothers. No one knew he was going. Sorry father, everyone likely knows now.
Since it was a Saturday, I was going to try and go to Mass on Saturday vigil (usually 5PM) and the GPS said I would likely arrive right at 5. I asked father when he was having his vigil mass. He said 4, my heart sank because I knew I would not be able to push it that much with only 3 hours to go. Father willingly offered a separate mass at 5:30 just for me and one of his brothers arriving about the same time. The entire Mass was offered up for all those coming from the 4 corners of the country to descend on our nation’s capital in a march to save America and for our leaders and for our military members. Basically, a Mass for God’s will to be done in whatever takes place.
A private mass for America.
We stayed in Alexandria next to King Street Metro stop. I was very familiar with the area and always loved going to the waterfront there for a peaceful walk in the park next to it. Old Town Alexandria is a great place to stop by if you go there. Speaking of the Metro, I had an old card from three years prior when I would do that daily commute. I wanted to make sure there was plenty of spare change on the Metro card so I walked there to add more if needed. The women in front of me to get a Metro card was also the women right in front of me when I checked into the hotel. She said she was going to the rally as well. I asked her why she felt she needed to be at this rally. She said the last time she was at a rally like this was in 1968 and this time she felt even stronger that she needed to be here. In 1968 I was only 11 years old so that gives you an idea about the age of this women. The priest and his brothers were about 60+ years old as well. We were the average attendees at this rally. The general consensus of the 5 of us, and the dozen other people I personally knew were there, was that our elected officials were not listening to us, the people of America. Just like in the March for Life, it was time to make a statement that We the People wanted to be heard. We all felt that there has been massive fraud on a scale yet unseen in America. While everyone kept asking where’s the evidence, the evidence was laid out for all America to see and yet the media still insisted there was no evidence.
I have personally seen the 1,000+ pages of court evidence that was submitted to every supreme court in those battleground states. I have personally watched over 12 hours of eyewitness testimonies given to the state legislatures in those states. I’m not going to pass judgment on whether there was fraud, but what I will pass judgment on is the fact that a court of law should have heard the evidence.
Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) remarked on the objection to the Arizona Electoral College votes.
There is enough evidence to warrant a review. To date, no court has ever considered the evidence on its merit. Each judge slowly crept into a corner and said it’s not appropriate for them to hear the case. Even the Supreme Court of the entire nation said the case is not something they can review. If there is fraud, the Supreme Court just ruled they do not have the jurisdiction to hear the case. Are you starting to see the untold story? Have you heard any of this from the news sources? What does a citizen do when their voices are not being heard? They rally to march on the nation’s capital.
And march we did. We arrived about 9 AM in the morning. The Ellipse was already completely full. We stood between the Ellipse and the Washington monument. The ground was wet from the rain the day before and I could see water around the edges of my shoe.
It was cold enough that the scarf I had was used as a makeshift mask while we waited. It was cold, wet, and no chairs to sit in for those 4 hours we were there. But, none of us were leaving. We wanted our voice to be heard. While we waited, there was plenty of time to talk with others. There was one family just in front of us. As the conversation ensued they admitted they were fallen away Catholics, and my priest friend said ‘Imagine that. Over 1M people here today and God places you right in front of a Catholic priest.’ They talked a bit about the issues they had with the church, but my friend is just a lover of people in general and always has a comforting and consoling spirit. Everyone is on their own journey in life and when those opportunities happen, it’s great to reflect on why God places those people in our paths. Whether the encounter was for the man we talked to or the priest is unknown. God works in mysterious ways.
We listened to the speakers. We listened to the President. We marched along Constitution Ave from 16th Street to 2nd Street. For several of us, we needed to stop and rest along the way. It had been a long day and many of us were tired. When we got to the Capitol Building, the lawn was pretty much full of fellow marchers. We stopped and talked with another group for about 20 minutes. We looked back and the stream of people was still coming in from Constitution Ave. Some people said there might have been as many as 3 million people there. We all had the same purpose… we wanted our leaders to know we wanted our voices heard. As we arrived at the Capitol Building we saw others along the second or third story walkway waving to people. I couldn’t understand the boldness of some people going that far up the steps. We all knew that Congress was deciding on the Electoral votes. That’s why I thought it was surprising they were up there.
Leo Kelly was one of the first men to breach the Capitol building and go inside with dozens of others. In this exclusive interview with LifeSiteNews correspondent Jim Hale, Leo talks about his conflicted feelings about what he did, and why he felt it was necessary.
At least a million Trump supporters poured into the nation’s capital on Wednesday to dispute the results of the Presidential Election. LifeSiteNews Correspondent Jim Hale has been in the middle of it all day.
After our conversation with the other group, we decided to head back to Alexandria for dinner. It was about 3PM when we left. We weren’t more than a block away when we heard police sirens and police cars and bicyclists rushing to the Capitol Building. We knew something must be up but had no idea what.
We got back to Alexandria and our priest said Mass. It was the feast of the Epiphany. What a blessing it was for me to have a Priest with us.
When we started hearing the reports come in about what happened, it was so surreal to hear the newscast. We were actually there and for us during the entire time it was a peaceful march. To see these images on TV was like, where were these taken at. It wasn’t the same event. And that poor women who was shot and killed by the Capitol Police, how did that happen? This was a peaceful march like an MLK march back in the day. So how did it get violent?
Many of the patriots were wearing body cameras to capture everything from the day (and night). From their cameras it can now be pieced together to understand what faces America.
Before the marchers arrived at the Capitol Building a series of shuttles were escorted by a police car to the Capitol Building and let a bunch of people out. From the journalist, AndWeKnow at https://www.andweknow.com/ His full report is below followed by the two minute snippet where he talks about these people that were being dropped off and how the Trump patriots placed themselves between the anarchists and the police in an attempt to protect the police. I saw a similar line of people like that scurrying between us as the President was about to finish his speech. I thought to myself they just wanted to be at the front of the line as we marched down Constitution Ave.
The activists or more appropriately, these anarchists, that were dropped off seemed to remove the barricades from in front of the building. Some of them propped the barriers sideways on the building and started a makeshift ladder. Of course I couldn’t understand why they needed a ladder when the steps were right there. My only explanation was it made for a good show. Remember, me and my friends and everyone we met were generally not in shape to do any climbing like that. It’s so shocking to see those images on TV.
After the anarchists made their way to the doors of the Capitol, they encouraged any of the patriots to come up there with them. Unfortunately, some patriots took the bait and followed them. Some doors were pried open by the anarchists, while other doors were opened by the security guards inside. Yes, there is actual footage with the guards not resisting the removing of the barriers and allowing people to go inside. (https://twitter.com/jihanbit/status/1346909463660396550?fbclid=IwAR2LxsOPkTkwwLj5s7IkL1XwQoJugD6a6UMrXkkXnuM_lGpBPAsab98mrVk ) If you are allowed inside by a security guard do you even think of how they might shoot and kill you? Who in their right mind would do this to people? I even saw footage where a security guard led the group up the right set of stairs to get to the chamber as quickly as possible. The footage by MSM had just a single snippet where it looked like the guard resisting. But if you watch the full segment you realize that was just a small portion and the rest of the video has him encouraging them to advance. And it seemed like there was only 1 security guard there at that corridor. From everything I’ve seen it looked like someone wanted to lead these people to the right spot to create the most chaos.
I firmly believe some people got swept up into the moment thinking citizens are allowed to watch senate hearings, so why not now. This is the peoples house right? I also believe, no I know, there were some people who were paid to start chaos in the meeting. They were dropped off in white shuttle vans in front of all to see. It was from the same playbook as what we saw this summer. The real question is who was behind the violence. I know the 1M or so patriots from earlier was all about peace and making a statement just like the MLK march was able to provide for America in earlier years. Here are two other views, one from another man and a second from a women, that were there and was peacefully present at the capitol. These two people’s story are almost exactly the same as what has been said thus far but it is another corroboration of the real narrative that happened. The women stood about 40 feet back from these thugs that were breaking the windows. Listen to her story on the Grace Force podcast.
The Mayor of NYC during 9/11 was Rudy Giuliani. He summarizes the same scenario as what is already stated but adds some research about the breadcrumbs that show who was really behind this. It’s so sad to see so many violent people engaged in such malicious actions in America and then to be assisted by security inside the Capitol. None of this is being reported by what should be trusted journalists in the US. Actually it is being reported by trusted journalists, just not the ones most of us listen to.
The untold story that has yet to be told is the covering up of the evidence of the illegal election. Now that Italy has announced their involvement in the fraud, maybe someone will listen. #italydidit
In his deposition, D’elio revealed the scheme that proved to be successful in using Leonardo computer systems as well as military satellites located in Pescara, Italy. D’elio’s hi-tech equipment altered the election results in the 2020 Presidential Election in the United States. D’elio swore under oath that he altered results in seventeen states—that’s right, seventeen, not just the six swing states.
And a courageous professor speaks out. He includes video showing the police removed the barriers and allowed, even encouraged, the Trump Supporters to come in. It also shows the Trump Supporters trying to stop Antifa from breaking the windows. They were also yelling out, the people trying to break the windows are Antifa.
Or maybe the President now has the power granted to him when foreign interference is found in a US election. Do you all know that story? Stay tuned for the next story that has not been told.
I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. Although there has been no evidence of a foreign power altering the outcome or vote tabulation in any United States election, foreign powers have historically sought to exploit America’s free and open political system. In recent years, the proliferation of digital devices and internet-based communications has created significant vulnerabilities and magnified the scope and intensity of the threat of foreign interference, as illustrated in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment. I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with this threat.
When I first heard that phrase by Sidney Powell I wondered if it was a phrase used in the Lord of the Rings. My son James, an expert in Star Wars, Fellowship of the Rings, and X-Men, quickly pointed out it was Clash of Titans. And right he was (as usual).
So when Sidney Powell referenced that she was making quite a statement. But, it wasn’t until I heard a 3 star general discuss it from a military angle that it really came into focus what was meant by that statement, “Release the Kraken!” Here is the post you can find out more about this military use of the term.
It was also discussed between two general’s in this interview:
Is this the demise of the Deep State? Does it point to China and Iran trying to change the outcome of a U.S. election? Take a listen, this truly is on a global scale and every American should sit up and take notice.
The Cancer of Corruption runs rampant in the United States, but it ran rampant in other countries that show where this nation will head if the citizenry allows it to happen. In this post you will find news that is shocking. News that you will never hear about in the main stream media. The main stream media is compromised and a part of the corruption of American politicians.
There is so much corruption in the United States, it’s hard to even know where to start. Should we start with Human Trafficking, Underage Child Abuse, Drug Trafficking, or the corruption in the church in America?
The election is within weeks so let’s start with what should be obvious to most Americans if the news channels actually did their job. And for all you that think Fox is the only one reporting accurate news, I remind you, ALL main stream news are compromised.
How many of you would be shocked if I reported this story:
“BIDEN GOES INTO HIDING AFTER LAPTOP EXPOSES PEDOPHILE RING”
How many of you would be shocked if I reported this story:
“BREAKING: Email From Hunter Biden’s Lawyer To Computer Shop Owner Released, Confirms Laptop Was Biden’s”
Or one from a very credible prosecutor:
Giulliani: Hunter Biden emails prove family “has been selling Joe’s office to the highest bidder”
Some people are fixated on the scandal being the censorship by the big tech.
That’s not the scandal. The real scandal is the torturing of children. In my earlier article I discussed the efforts in prior years to #savethechildren. What a touching story that was of one heroic man trying to save children he didn’t even know. That is God’s reaching out to influence the course of history is some young children’s lives.
It’s now time to start talking about the dark side. The evil that comes from corruption. Many times it’s just economic persecution, but the satan knows his time is short. He is working overtime to corrupt as many people as possible. And this type of corruption comes at the price of innocent lives, and the loss of innocence.
One thing that Rudy discusses is an issue that is so sensitive he cant’ even mention it. But, he does continue exposing all the family crimes in extorting money from other nations.
Why isn’t anyone in the main stream covering this story? Well, there is one exception, FoxNews does cover this cover-up and corruption.
But, how do we make sense out of the horrendous content Rudy Giuliani referred to. Could this post give some insight into how bad this could be?
Giuliani: SICKENING Photo’s on Hunter Biden’s Laptop Will ‘Shock the Hell Out of You’
President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani has warned that the unreleased photographs on Hunter Biden’s laptop will likely shock the American public to their very core.
As we know the big tech groups have censured several groups whose following were upwards of 1M subscribers. Here’s what one of them claims:
“reveal that the Hunter Biden videos contain multiple videos that captured Hunter Biden engaged in extreme sexual ABUSE of under-age Chinese teens“
Yes, the ultimate satanic act of torture or sexual abuse of children as young as ten years old. These people are sic.
As one news report states, “In other words, the Hunter Biden hard drives are not merely about sex. They are about violence and sexual abuse of minors. And the CCP has all these videos (and more) which can be used as leverage against a Biden presidency.”
Have you ever wondered why Joe Biden says China is not a threat. That China is the future? He has been bought and paid for by the CCP. If he becomes president he will sell out to the CCP influence.
The corruption runs deep, but I haven’t begun to scratch the surface. Stay tuned for part 2. Just remember one thing, it’s all about saving the children.
“DNI Declassifies CIA Memo That Comey Claimed to Have No Memory of Receiving” is an article in the Epoch Times written by Ivan Pentchoukov on October 6. The nice thing I like about Epoch Times in this article is they actually linked the document sources so that everyone could read for themselves the exact words stated by authoritative sources. If there are any fact checkers trying to discredit this article, they too can go to the original sources and read what is stated.
In this article we move from my previous post about “Entrapment of a General“, to now, “Entrapment of a President.” Someone might say, “By what authority do you say that?” So what is stated in these authoritative sources that allows one to deduce that is what was done?
In this official memorandum sent from the Director of National Intelligence to the Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary it starts by stating:
In late July 2016, U.S. intelligence agencies obtained insight into Russian intelligence analysis alleging that U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton had approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal against U.S. Presidential candidate Donald Trump by tying him to Putin and the Russians’ hacking of the Democratic National Committee.
Director of National Intelligence, Sep 29, 2020
Well, isn’t that interesting. In July 2016, the Intel agencies knew Hillary Clinton, the Democrat candidate for President, approved a plan to stir up a scandal against the Republican candidate for President. Would this be the same as digging up dirt that we as Americans have for so long witnessed in our electoral process. It’s one thing to uncover evidence of wrong doing, so called dirt, by a candidate. It’s a completely different story to actually create the dirt and call it fact. That is more akin to slander which can be prosecuted in a court of law.
But, here’s another thing right out of the gate, The Intel Agencies all knew it was happening. Yes, they knew in 2016 that the Russian collusion narrative against then candidate Trump was all a hoax that was started by an agent for Russia. In other words, they knew Russia was interfering by using an agent who was collaborating with the Democrat candidate. A Russian agent collaborated with one political party whose candidate was running for the highest office in the free world, the office of President of these United States. The Intel Agencies knew in 2016 before the election ever happened and before the investigation into President Trump (after January 2017) was ever started.
Interesting thing on this e-mail released on Sep 29th is that it is addressed to the “Honorable Adam Schiff.” Who is Adam Schiff you might ask? For the last several years he has been the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. For three years we have been hearing that the “Honorable Adam Schiff” had conclusive evidence on the wrong doing by the newly elected President. Each time he would state it though, it would lead to disappointment as he failed to produce anything that withstood the test of scrutiny. Everything reported was from anonymous sources who were not willing to put their name behind their allegations. Now we find out that in 2016 he knew Russia was colluding with the Democrat party to try and CREATE dirt on the Republican candidate. And when that same candidate actually won the election, they tried to discredit his administration by taking America through the most horrific political fight America has ever seen. Three years of constant badgering and accusations.
What else is revealed in this letter dated Sept 29th? There are handwritten notes from CIA Director Brennan who was also present when this was revealed in 2016.
“alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016 of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.”
CIA Director Brennan
Wait a minute. The CIA Director, John Brennan, who took these notes, knew there was an effort to “vilify Donald Trump” and yet never said a single word about this for 3 years? How is this possible in America? Who else was in that meeting?
Let’s see, the meeting was held in July 2016. Who was the President of the United States (POTUS) at that time? President Obama!! Wait, President Obama is asking about any evidence of collaboration between the Trump campaign and Russia? The next person to speak was JC (could this be James Comey) but we don’t know what his response was. Is it possible his response was “Mr. President, the person providing the information is a Russian spy?” I would hope so. He was the head of the FBI at that point. That’s their job. Which brings us back to his testimony this week. James Comey, the previous Director of the FBI stated he had no memory of receiving the CIA Memo. What CIA Memo?
Yes, a memo written specifically to the Director of the FBI on 7 September 2016. Who was the FBI Director? James Comey. It’s about Crossfire Hurricane. See my prior post for more details about that operation. Here’s something else about Hillary Clinton in that memo.
So again, they repeat the topic from July. The fact that the Democrat candidate for President approved a plan. And why did she approve the plan? Based upon what they found out during Crossfire Hurricane operation, they knew she did this “as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server.” Everything was done for one reason. To cover up what might be in that “unclassified” server she used as her email server.
For those that are old enough to remember Watergate, it wasn’t the crime that President Nixon was accused of. President Nixon resigned because of his involvement in the “cover-up”!! In this case, President Obama is not accused of covering up anything. He was a willing participant in the crime. What crime? Trying to take down a duly elected President. They tried before he became President and then they continued after he became President. What is the name of the crime? What is the possible punishment?
Treason is defined in Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution. It states: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”
The real question for the Court Martial to address of the people who participated in the July and September 2016 meetings is whether their behavior was meant as an act of war against the will of the American people. Was it a way to change the results of the election? Was it a way to replace a duly elected President and his administration? In 1807 the Supreme Court ruled that “there must be an actual assembling of men, for the treasonable purpose, to constitute a levying of war.” Do you think it can be proven that these intelligence leaders conspired with a sitting President to change the election results and if not, to try and “take out” that President once they took office?
For three years we have heard that it is nothing more than a right-wing conspiracy theory to even think something of that order has happened. Today “Conspiracy Theory” becomes “Conspiracy Fact”!! They conspired to take out this President and his administration. They did this so we did not focus on the Hillary email server. What was in that server that was this important. Inquiring minds would like to know!!
To follow-up on a prior post “Who is Fact Checking the Fact Checkers” I ran across a very good article today on how to really fight back with the likes of snopes and other so called fact checking organizations.
The C-Vine News Network received an e-mail from an organization that is in the business of fact checking groups like CNN and Epoch Times.
In the article there is an e-mail they received from this fact checking group, NewsGuard. The reporter, at least that’s who they said they were in an e-mail, wanted to talk about transparency and credibility.
How many people have ever heard of NewsGuard or this reporter, Anicka Slachta? Who is paying their bills and how credible have them been at fact checking in the past? We’re they a part of the media that were non the wrong side of reality when they reported there was Russian collusion for three years? Looking at the evidence now, any serious journalist would have said there is no basis for their investigation. And yet, news agency filled the airwaves for months and years with a story that wasn’t there. There were even high ranking officials who said “There is no there, there.” But, that fell on deaf ears for these so called credible news agencies. Anyone who followed the narrative and reported the incorrect story should be tuned out. They didn’t do their job. Citizen journalists like Linda Forsythe and C-Vine were saying all along that there was no evidence. Citizen journalists were doing a better job of investigating the facts than the multi-million dollar news agencies. Why? Who’s paying the bills at these news agencies?
Linda’s response to NewsGuard is priceless. It’s time to research the fact checkers and see what agenda they support and who is paying their bills.
With a fair election process, every voice should be heard and counted. Now that the Social Media giants are suppressing free speech, who is fact checking their fact checkers to make sure their decisions are in line with the public interest of a fair election process? Makes you wonder right?
Don’t blindly assume if you see a fact checker and they will be speaking in a non-biased organization. Don’t be duped. Check the sources.
Sandra, the Prophecy Lady, takes issue with communist agents, BLM, antifa etc.who insist that America’s founding was an evil Enterprise. On the contrary she proves that the founding of our nation was a great Act of Faith and actually Divine Providence! Part of God’s plan!
There is so much fear in the world today that decision makers are no longer waiting for facts to make very critical and sometimes life saving actions during this pandemic.
Many politicians and church leaders are either leading with a hidden agenda, leading without facts, or simply leading with what they believe will get them elected or keep them in power. I fall short of saying all leaders because there are some leaders who are looking at the data and making sound policy decisions with the well being and livelihood of their constituents in mind.
There are so many examples to highlight but let me start with the Catholic Church. Our bishops in the USA were among the first to be overly cautious about large gatherings and for a short time decided to close down all worship services. After all, the secular world was looking to ‘flatten the curve’ as everyone put it. The reason we were going to ‘flatten the curve’ was to make sure our hospital staff would not be overwhelmed with the large amount of illness and deaths that would accompany this pandemic. Without any data we would have to assume it might be as bad as the Spanish flu outbreak in 1918.
The 1918 influenza pandemic was the most severe pandemic in recent history. It was caused by an H1N1 virus with genes of avian origin. Although there is not universal consensus regarding where the virus originated, it spread worldwide during 1918-1919. In the United States, it was first identified in military personnel in spring 1918.
It is estimated that about 500 million people or one-third of the world’s population became infected with this virus. The number of deaths was estimated to be at least 50 million worldwide with about 675,000 occurring in the United States. Mortality was high in people younger than 5 years old, 20-40 years old, and 65 years and older. The high mortality in healthy people, including those in the 20-40 year age group, was a unique feature of this pandemic.
With that possibility, everyone seemed willing to pitch in and tighten the belt so to speak to ensure we minimize the deaths or ‘flatten the curve’ so that hospitals would not be overwhelmed. With little factual data on how this disease spreads, the first measure was to minimize large gatherings and cancel church services. Fair enough. The less gatherings the less likely a sick person can infect the rest of the group. But, for all the healthy people in the world, that action has now impacted their freedom to some degree. Sometimes freedom and quality of life needs to be compromised for the sake of those at risk of catching and then being killed by the disease. But, how likely is that. At first, there was not enough data to define that answer.
I was very fortunate to be in the Diocese of Las Cruces where Bishop Baldacchino was the first to allow the Catholic Mass to continue but with occupancy limitations. “It has become increasingly clear that the state shutdown will last for some time. Depriving the faithful of the nourishment offered through the Eucharist was indeed a difficult decision, one that I deemed necessary until I had further clarity regarding our current state of affairs, but it cannot become the ‘status quo’ for the foreseeable future.”
With that action though came the ill informed decision to limit the reception of the Eucharist to allow it to be placed in the hand only. In Europe the traditional way to receive communion is on the tongue. The person receiving the bread from heaven, the ‘body of Christ,’ never touches it, except on the tongue to allow it to nourish the soul. As it says in the Gospel of John:
I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats this bread will live forever. This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world. Very truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day. For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in them. Just as the living Father sent me and I live because of the Father, so the one who feeds on me will live because of me. This is the bread that came down from heaven. Your ancestors ate manna and died, but whoever feeds on this bread will live forever.
Receiving the Eucharist, the body of Christ, in the hand was claimed to be safer so the priest would not touch the tongue of the recipient and possibly transfer the disease to another person. But, what data would back that up? Again, in Europe and even the oldest traditions of the church had recipients receiving the Eucharist on the tongue. And now there are 21 doctors telling bishops Communion on the tongue is ‘safer’ than in hand.
Why would they say the hand is not as safe as receiving on the tongue?
As a doctor, I am convinced that Communion in the hand is less hygienic and therefore less safe than Communion in the mouth. What is certain is that the hands are the parts of the body that are most exposed to pathogens.
Prof. Filippo Maria Boscia
These doctors go on in their report with this acknowledgement:
It is part of the traditional rite that the priest should wash his hands in the sacristy immediately before the beginning of Holy Mass. Only he touches the chalice and ciborium. After the consecration, he keeps his thumb and index finger – which he has ritually washed with water again just before – closed until after Communion, so he does not touch anything with them except the consecrated Host. The priests who celebrate in the traditional rite are experienced in administering communion on the tongue and practically never have contact with the mouth of the communicant. Should this happen, however, a priest can be credited with such a sense of responsibility that, taking into account the present situation, he will interrupt the giving of Communion and clean his hands.
Comments from Catholic doctors in Austria
The point here is that a practice was embraced that was not based on facts, but based upon emotions. That decision has left many faithful Catholics to receive the Eucharist on the hand when their instincts and reverence to the Lord would want them to receive on the tongue. How long will this ill informed decision continue before the facts become overwhelming in support of the opposite?
What other ill informed decisions are there? Let’s talk masks for a minute. Whenever there are infected people with diseases that can spread you limit the exposure that person has to others. Usually infection comes with symptoms that will alert the sick person that they should self quarantine. With this disease, there are a small percentage of the population that do not have symptoms even though a test might show they do have the disease. So, the decision is that all people should wear masks. By wearing a mask you are then helping out the person next to you. Instead of sick people wearing the mask, all healthy people are wearing the masks. Did anyone stop to ask, what is the likelihood of a healthy person becoming sick from wearing a mask? How many people would be surprised to hear you have more of a risk of becoming sick by wearing a mask?
Pretty bold statement right? Is it possible this ill informed decision is actually making more people sick than it’s helping?
OSHA says some masks are okay and not okay in certain situations. What are they?
Health care professionals are wearing N-95 masks. Should you? N95 masks are designed for contaminated environments. When you exhale through N95 the design is that you are exhaling into a contaminated environment. The exhale from N95 masks are vented to breath straight out without filtration. If you have a disease, that disease will be exhaled into the environment. They don’t filter the air on the way out. Conclusion: if you are healthy, the N-95 mask protects you, not your neighbor. If you have the disease, you are doing more harm by giving the appearance that you are protecting others, when in fact, no mask is better than wearing an N-95 mask. At least people might stay further away if you were not wearing a mask.
How about a surgical mask. Should you wear a surgical mask? Chris Barr (OSHA 10&30 certified) posted this on Facebook on June 25th, 2020:
Surgical Mask: these masks were designed and approved for STERILE environments. The amount of particles and contaminants in the outside and indoor environments where people are CLOGGING these masks very, VERY quickly. The moisture from your breath combined with the clogged mask will render it “useless” IF you come in contact with Covid and your mask traps it, YOU become a walking virus dispenser. Everytime you put your mask on you are breathing the germs from EVERYWHERE you went. They should be changed or thrown out every “20-30 minutes in a non sterile environment.”
Chris Barr (OSHA 10&30 certified)
Unless you are a healthcare provider, a surgical mask is not likely something you want to start wearing.
But maybe these cute little face masks we all are wearing is the real answer right?
Cloth masks: I can’t even believe I’m having to explain this, but here it goes. Today, three people pointed to their masks as they walked by me entering Lowe’s. They said “ya gotta wear your mask BRO” I said very clearly “those masks don’t work bro, in fact they MAKE you sicker” they “pshh’d” me. By now hopefully you all know CLOTH masks do not filter anything. You mean the American flag one my aunt made? Yes. The one with sunflowers that looks so cute? Yes. The bandanna, the cut up t-shirt, the scarf ALL of them offer NO FILTERING whatsoever. As you exhale, you are ridding your lungs of contaminants and carbon dioxide. Cloth masks trap this carbon dioxide the best. It actually risks your health, rather than protect it. The moisture caught in these masks can become mildew ridden over night. Dry coughing, enhanced allergies, sore throat are all symptoms of a micro-mold in your mask.
Chris Barr (OSHA 10&30 certified)
Professionals are also weighing in, these two ER doctors were not wearing a mask during their interview. They were asked why they didn’t wear a mask. Their response was something to the effect “because we understand immunology.”
And if a convincing argument has not been made, let’s turn to the New England Journal of Medicine where 3 doctors and a nurse say “a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.” They continued with “the chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefor minimal.”
We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.
N Engl J Med May 21, 2020
And this same hints to these masks actually causing more harm.
What is clear, however, is that universal masking alone is not a panacea. A mask will not protect providers caring for a patient with active Covid-19 if it’s not accompanied by meticulous hand hygiene, eye protection, gloves, and a gown. A mask alone will not prevent health care workers with early Covid-19 from contaminating their hands and spreading the virus to patients and colleagues. Focusing on universal masking alone may, paradoxically, lead to more transmission of Covid-19 if it diverts attention from implementing more fundamental infection-control measures.
N Engl J Med May 21, 2020
Why are we wearing masks? Symbolism? Here’s what that article says about symbolism and masks. There’s little to no benefit to wearing a mask. It’s simply a placebo.
It is also clear that masks serve symbolic roles.Masks are not only tools, they are also talismans that may help increase health care workers’ perceived sense of safety, well-being, and trust in their hospitals. Although such reactions may not be strictly logical, we are all subject to fear and anxiety, especially during times of crisis. One might argue that fear and anxiety are better countered with data and education than with a marginally beneficial mask, particularly in light of the worldwide mask shortage, but it is difficult to get clinicians to hear this message in the heat of the current crisis. Expanded masking protocols’ greatest contribution may be to reduce the transmission of anxiety, over and above whatever role they may play in reducing transmission of Covid-19.
N Engl J Med May 21, 2020
People are starting to question these draconian practices, and for good reasons.
And now we are learning the organizations we thought knew everything are actually changing their minds. When science is based upon a changing set of rules and statements, it’s not science but folklore. A science based upon faulty data collection and theories.
The World Health Organization announced that asymptomatic carriers of the coronavirus “rarely” spread the virus to others according to this report in the Washington Examiner.
Even the esteemed Dr. Fauci stated in March that masks were not effective for this disease. In 2005, he also said HCQ was an effective drug for these types of diseases. I’m sure the powers to be reminded him of the narrative they were paying him to promote and in May he changed his tune and started to wear a mask in public. This was something he was very adamant was not effective just two months prior. And recently he has been very vocal that HCQ is not effective for these types of illnesses. He seems to be making decisions based on some sort of agenda. But what agenda could it be?
And so what are the facts about this disease. We hear the fear porn saying cases are increasing as if “we’re all going to die!” Well, as the Bible clearly states:
Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.
That is an interesting stat but it says nothing for the trend. So what does the trend look like?
The steepest graph on the left depicts the amount of new tests. We are testing more than ever before. Over three times the rate as to when we first started in March. The number of new cases is on the rise but still only about 30% more than it was in March. The chart on the right is the number of new deaths. Yes there are more deaths, but those deaths are over 50% fewer than what we started with in March.
The people that want to make ill informed decisions are at it again. Now that the disease is on the retreat, as can clearly be seen with current hospitalization, and now that we have indeed ‘flattened the curve’ and there is no risk to overwhelming the hospitals, our leaders want to impose more draconian measures on us.
Is it time to wear a mask or is it time to go out in public and let the immunology experts weigh in that say herd immunity is the most likely strategy for success at this point.
I started this article with the corollary of the 1918 Spanish flu. During that time, in 1919, there was the third wave of the pandemic and it continued seasonally for 38 years. During that time, no one wore masks. The deadliest disease in the 20th century and no one wore even cloth masks. The economy had its best years right after the pandemic, until the great depression of 1929-1932.
The world is on track for a major economic crash. An economic crash that would indeed be biblical.
Let’s hope our leaders start making decisions based on facts and not emotions or political advantage. If this is truly the time depicted in the last book of the Bible than our hope will be on the false peace that is to come just before the rise of the Antichrist. And the extended peace that follows the tribulation of those days.
Universal Masking in Hospitals in the Covid-19 Era, MICHAEL KLOMPAS, M.D., M.P.H., CHARLES A. MORRIS, M.D., M.P.H., JULIA SINCLAIR, M.B.A., MADELYN PEARSON, D.N.P., R.N., AND ERICA S. SHENOY, M.D., PH.D., New England Journal of Medecine, May 2020, https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372?query=TOC
The operation that targeted Flynn: CROSSFIRE RAZOR
It’s hard to imagine a 3 star General being trapped by his own government and coerced to sign a false confession. Were they really ready to indict his son on phony charges as well? Were they going to try and destroy his son as well? When your family is threatened, you will do anything to protect them.
But, before we go too far on what might be labelled a conspiracy theory, let’s examine the evidence. What I don’t like about the main stream media is they seldom make the source documents available for you to examine. I hope I can do better at providing you links so you can see the documents that are filed with the courts and other government agencies. Many thanks to Judicial Watch, Sara Carter and Sydney Powell for their efforts to bring these source documents to the people through easy access and/or FOIA requests.
First, let me give credit where it is due. Here is the post Sydney Powell wrote on April 30, 2020:
Here is the document that was filed with the courts on 4/30/2020. Case 1:17-cr-00232-EGS Document 189 Filed 04/30/20
On April 29, 2020, the government produced to the defense a second tranche comprised of eleven pages, including emails and additional Strzok-Page text messages. See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and this Court’s standing order, ECF No. 10.
Case 1:17-cr-00232-EGS Document 189 Filed 04/30/20
Why are these important and why are they just now being disclosed? What is included in these Strzok-Page text messages and how do they differ from what was discussed in 2019?
If you recall there was CROSSFIRE HURRICANE which was described in the above article.
Now we find in these new documents there was another investigation (or individual) called CROSSFIRE RAZOR. On page 3 of the court document you see the Case ID # from a document on 1/4/2017 that includes “CROSSFIRE RAZOR FOREIGN AGENTS REGISTRATION ACT – RUSSIA”
In the details you see the reference to where CROSSFIRE RAZOR (CR) is referenced like an individual. It says
And now we know that General Flynn, under investigation by the FBI during CROSSFIRE HURRICANE is referred as CROSSFIRE RAZOR. Makes you wonder what other names are used for individuals in this report.
Shortly into their investigation into General Flynn we see they come up empty handed on any information that would incriminate the good General.
You have to ask yourself while reading this, “How many dollars were spent during this part of the investigation?” Keep in mind the final tally was over $30M for these investigators.
Besides not finding any derogatory information in their own holdings, they also requested two other intelligence sources for any records, and still no dirt was found.
Not satisfied with a squeaky clean and true patriot in their midst, they took it to the next level. In their own words:
Unbelievable, now how many taxpayer dollars have been spent thusfar?
The end result is the FBI decides to close the case since no dirt can be found on General Flynn.
But, this is where the real corruption takes place. So far everything is above board. An inquire was warranted and an investigation was needed. It was completed. Look at the evidence about Peter Strzok starting on page 7.
According to Peter Strzok, General Flynn was given a briefing and Mr. Strzok recommends actions like, “put him on notice,” hoping he does something inappropriate. He also indicates an “overt step with him … interview under light ‘defensive briefing’ context.
Yes, indeed it was the interview under false pretense to set him up, overtly.
But look how revealing this segment is. Now we realize they have another individual codenamed, CROSSFIRE TYPHOON. And what date was this e-mail written? What date was the inauguration? Another revealing piece is VPOTUS. Could they be talking about the new Vice President or the VP that was just leaving (Biden).
Now we move to the exchange of texts on page 10 during these days in January.
And in February, Strzok texts how many edits he made to the notes of the meeting. There were so many edits he actually called it a complete rewrite. I guess he needed to make sure he chose his words wisely (instead of just recording the conversation from the interview). Was this the interview with Flynn?
The last 4 pages of the document are the summary for the court on why this case should be dismissed. Pretty solid evidence of such. Here’s the first paragraph:
The revelations of corruption by the FBI to intentionally frame Gen Flynn for crimes the FBI manufactured piles on with each new production of documents. Unequivocally, the documents prove the egregious extent to which those involved violated the constitutional rights of the National Security Advisor of the United States of America and a military hero, who put his life on the line for over three decades to preserve those very rights for every American citizen.
COMMENTS FOR ATTRIBUTION BY SIDNEY POWELL, COUNSEL TO GEN FLYNN
Do you think you will hear any of this on the main stream news like MSNBC, CNN, and CBS? If you do hear it, how will they spin it? The main stream media, MSNBC, CNN, and CBS seem to have a stake in the Presidential race. What side are they leaning too? What candidate are they supporting? Corruption runs deep. It really is time to drain the swamp.
There was a webcast by American Thought Leaders about this recent release. This type of very candid journalism gives hope that maybe one day the main stream media will be replaced with honest and true reporting again.