Requirements for a Free Press

The American people are being withheld the truth by the most powerful arm of the federal government, the press. The press has turned into a censorship of the truth about what is really happening that has the possibility of killing hundreds of millions and possibly a billion of unsuspecting people who trust in their government and in their health care professionals. Every family will be impacted by this threat. One of the greatest American Presidents in our time was John Fitzgerald Kennedy, JFK. His brother Bobby Kennedy was the Attorney General in his administration. Together they championed some major legislation and legal proceedings into corruption in big business and unions alike. Both were prominent members of the Democratic Party. Both were shot and killed for what I believe was their views and the corruption they tried to rid from the American people. You don’t make many elite brownie points when you champion the burden of low income America. What a time it was to witness the boldness of these two great Democratic Americans who were fighting for the average American. They wanted to make America great and all the people in it.

One of the speeches the 35th President of the United States gave early in his presidency was the Address “The President and the Press” Before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, New York City. In it, JFK stresses the responsibility of both the president and the press. Although his speech is oriented to the threat posed during the height of the struggle with Cuba, his words are as appropriate now but for a different threat. The threat of a press that no longer echoes the truth but has become a puppet for the uni-party system in this great country we call America.

Below are snippets from his speech (emphasis is mine).

I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger. The events of recent weeks may have helped to illuminate that challenge for some; but the dimensions of its threat have loomed large on the horizon for many years. Whatever our hopes may be for the future–for reducing this threat or living with it–there is no escaping either the gravity or the totality of its challenge to our survival and to our security–a challenge that confronts us in unaccustomed ways in every sphere of human activity.

This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President–two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy.

I.

The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country’s peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort, based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of “clear and present danger,” the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public’s need for national security.

Today no war has been declared–and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired.

If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger,” then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions–by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security-and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion….

…I have no intention of establishing a new Office of War Information to govern the flow of news. I am not suggesting any new forms of censorship or any new types of security classifications. I have no easy answer to the dilemma that I have posed, and would not seek to impose it if I had one… 

…Perhaps there will be no recommendations. Perhaps there is no answer to the dilemma faced by a free and open society in a cold and secret war. In times of peace, any discussion of this subject, and any action that results, are both painful and without precedent. But this is a time of peace and peril which knows no precedent in history.

II

It is the unprecedented nature of this challenge that also gives rise to your second obligation–an obligation which I share. And that is our obligation to inform and alert the American people–to make certain that they possess all the facts that they need, and understand them as well–the perils, the prospects, the purposes of our program and the choices that we face.

President John F. Kennedy
Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, New York City
April 27, 1961

Right now in America the greatest veil that there has ever been has been placed on the truth of what is happening. Just like the “repugnant secrecy” JFK talked about. There is a deeper and more sinister secrecy among what most refer to as the global elites. Many of them attend the meetings in Davos Switzerland and plan a strategy for all nations. They plan a global rule which is not elected by any nation other than the possible national leaders who conspire with them.

The most recent example is the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the World Health Organization (WHO). These two organizations are setting themselves up as the one world government discussed in the last book of the Bible. Lastly, not much press time has covered the religious leaders who have gotten together in recent days to add a new set of ten commandments based on their view that as gods they can define what the Almighty forgot in the original set he gave us at Mt. Sinai. And to mock the One True God, they met at Mt. Sinai on Sunday, November 13th, 2022.

In their words:

We return to Sinai in a movement of repentance and quest. We seek a new vision for humanity and its endangered existence, and we seek to receive and amplify a message of life sustaining living and habits that humanity needs to hear today. In this spirit, the project partners will bring together premier religious leaders from the world’s major religions to gather upon Mount Sinai to engage in a first ever Climate Repentance Ceremony, and to put forth a prophetic interreligious call to action: “Climate Justice: Ten Universal Commandments.”

https://elijah-interfaith.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Returning-to-Sinai-Proposal-1.pdf

So the triad of economic, health, and religious have now become complete to fulfill what Jesus proclaimed in His Revelation. And with all nations now agreeing this crisis needs a global governance body, that body becomes the United Nations (UN). The UN will allow the WHO to take charge of all mandatory inoculations if a global pandemic like COVID-19 strikes again. The preparations for that event are already underway and they need it soon to continue restricting the rights of God’s people.

In JFK’s speech he said “I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers–I welcome it.” In December 2022 we received word, not from the media, but from a corporate leader who might feel remorse about purchasing a social media company called Twitter that was so corrupt. We now find out Twitter has been active in the last 2 election cycles to silence public opinion but more evil is silencing a particular political party and their candidates and the issues they want to express to the American people. There is clear evidence that Twitter employees were taking orders from both political parties, but the Democratic party seemed to be the favored one among twitter employees, based upon the platforms they supported through their own contributions.

JFK, close to his closing remarks says “Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed–and no republic can survive.” I believe JFK was right and I believe only the American people can right this ship. With money comes power, and with power comes corruption. To remove the corruption, remove the money. People need to realize they’ve been lied to and the lie continues through the most powerful arm of the government at this time, the press.

There was a COVID-19 Health Summit that met on December 8th, 2022. Did you hear about it on your local news station? Not likely. Whereas the building housing the summit by a senator usually always accommodates with audio gear, this time they said there were none available. Del Bigtree of TheHighWire.com stepped in and provided a professional videotaping service to livestream and capture the event. Review this post for more info on that event. It is not hyperbole to say this will result in the loss of life of hundreds of millions across the globe. This is important America!! We need to fix it as a single team and we need to take back the power of “We The People.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For security, use of hCaptcha is required which is subject to their Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

I agree to these terms.