What do citizens of America do if the political elite get so well established that they “scratch each other’s backs” and ensure neither get prosecuted for crimes they are committing? What did the framers of our American Constitution place into the power of the people to correct such a situation?
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.Fifth Amendment
On https://www.heritage.org there is a Guide to the Constitution that explains the history of the grand jury process. It explains how this process was used in England and then brought by our founding fathers into America in a formal way in the Constitution. The first grand jury session was held in Virginia in 1625, and the practice soon spread to the other English colonies. 1
The basic purpose of the English grand jury was to provide a fair method for instituting criminal proceedings against persons believed to have committed crimes. Grand jurors were selected from the body of the people and their work was not hampered by rigid procedural or evidential rules. In fact, grand jurors could act on their own knowledge and were free to make their presentments or indictments on such information as they deemed satisfactory. 2
The grand jury has convened as a body of laymen, free from technical rules, acting in secret, pledged to indict no one because of prejudice and to free no one because of special favor. 2
The political elite have secured this “special favor” status through bribery, support, compromising data on others, and other corrupt practices. The citizen grand jury sounds like an appropriate venue to indict people for crimes. Crimes against humanity and crimes of treason for aiding and abetting those wishing to harm America and Americans.
There are several groups already taking action to coalesce a grand jury to evaluate the facts of the election fraud, the pandemic, and even the 9-11 infamous event that took so many Americans.
The next series of videos are from the citizen grand jury with testimonies from doctors, scientists, and lawyers from around the world.
The ‘Peoples´ Court of Public Opinion held 5 days worth of proceedings that are modeled after the US grand jury proceeding. Their investigation purpose is twofold: On the one hand it is to serve as a model proceeding and get indictments against some of the criminally and civilly responsible figure heads of these crimes against humanity. And on the other hand it is – through showing a complete picture of what we are facing, including the geopolitical and historical backdrop – to create awareness about:
– the factual collapse of the current, hijacked system and its institutions, and, as a consequence
– the necessity for the people themselves retaking their sovereignty, and
– the necessity to first stop this plandemic´s measures by refusing to comply, and
– the necessity to jump-start their own new system of health care, education, economics and judiciary, so that democracy and the rule of law on the basis of our constitutions will be reestablished.
Viviane Fischer opens the grand jury proceedings and Ana Garner discusses the background of the process being used.
Deana Pollard Sacks discusses the legal basis of these proceedings.
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich presents opening arguments for the testimony about to be presented on the subsequent days for this court proceeding.
Dexter L-J. Ryneveldt, Attorney at Law, presents opening remarks.
Dipali Ojha from India presents opening arguments about alternative medicines that are frequently found in the Indian culture that were not considered during the pandemic
Presenting the Evidence
Day 3 Preview – The end of the game for them is to inject toxicity that is a chemical and irradiation level and not just an mRNA, etc. The real crime is that people are dying, not because of something we have not identified… The end goal is… changing and editing the genome… It is changing who we are.
Daily proceedings in a single video:
In the last video it discusses remdesivir. The report on the approval process for remdesivir adds credence to those claims. (https://www.science.org/content/article/very-very-bad-look-remdesivir-first-fda-approved-covid-19-drug)
Citizen Grand Jury headed up by lawyer Larry Klayman.
1 – The Heritage Guide to the Constitution,
2 – Amdt220.127.116.11 Grand Jury Clause: Historical Background,