“DNI Declassifies CIA Memo That Comey Claimed to Have No Memory of Receiving” is an article in the Epoch Times written by Ivan Pentchoukov on October 6. The nice thing I like about Epoch Times in this article is they actually linked the document sources so that everyone could read for themselves the exact words stated by authoritative sources. If there are any fact checkers trying to discredit this article, they too can go to the original sources and read what is stated.
In this article we move from my previous post about “Entrapment of a General“, to now, “Entrapment of a President.” Someone might say, “By what authority do you say that?” So what is stated in these authoritative sources that allows one to deduce that is what was done?
In this official memorandum sent from the Director of National Intelligence to the Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary it starts by stating:
In late July 2016, U.S. intelligence agencies obtained insight into Russian intelligence analysis alleging that U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton had approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal against U.S. Presidential candidate Donald Trump by tying him to Putin and the Russians’ hacking of the Democratic National Committee.Director of National Intelligence, Sep 29, 2020
Well, isn’t that interesting. In July 2016, the Intel agencies knew Hillary Clinton, the Democrat candidate for President, approved a plan to stir up a scandal against the Republican candidate for President. Would this be the same as digging up dirt that we as Americans have for so long witnessed in our electoral process. It’s one thing to uncover evidence of wrong doing, so called dirt, by a candidate. It’s a completely different story to actually create the dirt and call it fact. That is more akin to slander which can be prosecuted in a court of law.
But, here’s another thing right out of the gate, The Intel Agencies all knew it was happening. Yes, they knew in 2016 that the Russian collusion narrative against then candidate Trump was all a hoax that was started by an agent for Russia. In other words, they knew Russia was interfering by using an agent who was collaborating with the Democrat candidate. A Russian agent collaborated with one political party whose candidate was running for the highest office in the free world, the office of President of these United States. The Intel Agencies knew in 2016 before the election ever happened and before the investigation into President Trump (after January 2017) was ever started.
Interesting thing on this e-mail released on Sep 29th is that it is addressed to the “Honorable Adam Schiff.” Who is Adam Schiff you might ask? For the last several years he has been the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. For three years we have been hearing that the “Honorable Adam Schiff” had conclusive evidence on the wrong doing by the newly elected President. Each time he would state it though, it would lead to disappointment as he failed to produce anything that withstood the test of scrutiny. Everything reported was from anonymous sources who were not willing to put their name behind their allegations. Now we find out that in 2016 he knew Russia was colluding with the Democrat party to try and CREATE dirt on the Republican candidate. And when that same candidate actually won the election, they tried to discredit his administration by taking America through the most horrific political fight America has ever seen. Three years of constant badgering and accusations.
What else is revealed in this letter dated Sept 29th? There are handwritten notes from CIA Director Brennan who was also present when this was revealed in 2016.
“alleged approval by Hillary Clinton on July 26, 2016 of a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.”CIA Director Brennan
Wait a minute. The CIA Director, John Brennan, who took these notes, knew there was an effort to “vilify Donald Trump” and yet never said a single word about this for 3 years? How is this possible in America? Who else was in that meeting?
Let’s see, the meeting was held in July 2016. Who was the President of the United States (POTUS) at that time? President Obama!! Wait, President Obama is asking about any evidence of collaboration between the Trump campaign and Russia? The next person to speak was JC (could this be James Comey) but we don’t know what his response was. Is it possible his response was “Mr. President, the person providing the information is a Russian spy?” I would hope so. He was the head of the FBI at that point. That’s their job. Which brings us back to his testimony this week. James Comey, the previous Director of the FBI stated he had no memory of receiving the CIA Memo. What CIA Memo?
Yes, a memo written specifically to the Director of the FBI on 7 September 2016. Who was the FBI Director? James Comey. It’s about Crossfire Hurricane. See my prior post for more details about that operation. Here’s something else about Hillary Clinton in that memo.
So again, they repeat the topic from July. The fact that the Democrat candidate for President approved a plan. And why did she approve the plan? Based upon what they found out during Crossfire Hurricane operation, they knew she did this “as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server.” Everything was done for one reason. To cover up what might be in that “unclassified” server she used as her email server.
For those that are old enough to remember Watergate, it wasn’t the crime that President Nixon was accused of. President Nixon resigned because of his involvement in the “cover-up”!! In this case, President Obama is not accused of covering up anything. He was a willing participant in the crime. What crime? Trying to take down a duly elected President. They tried before he became President and then they continued after he became President. What is the name of the crime? What is the possible punishment?
Treason is defined in Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution. It states: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”
The real question for the Court Martial to address of the people who participated in the July and September 2016 meetings is whether their behavior was meant as an act of war against the will of the American people. Was it a way to change the results of the election? Was it a way to replace a duly elected President and his administration? In 1807 the Supreme Court ruled that “there must be an actual assembling of men, for the treasonable purpose, to constitute a levying of war.” Do you think it can be proven that these intelligence leaders conspired with a sitting President to change the election results and if not, to try and “take out” that President once they took office?
For three years we have heard that it is nothing more than a right-wing conspiracy theory to even think something of that order has happened. Today “Conspiracy Theory” becomes “Conspiracy Fact”!! They conspired to take out this President and his administration. They did this so we did not focus on the Hillary email server. What was in that server that was this important. Inquiring minds would like to know!!